Q: I feel I don't *deserve* to be rich — and I'm afraid heaven will take it back. What do I do?
James: this mindset is extremely common. The sense of not deserving isn't your nature — it's taught by traditional Asian 'pickle-jar' culture: parents drill in 'work hard, don't get fanciful ideas, gold doesn't fall from the sky,' and it enslaves us. The correct view is 'Being rich is a birthright! Happiness is a human right!' We were born deserving wealth; a lifetime of labor is a shackle handed to us by society and family, not fate. Pursuing wealth, happiness, and well-being is everyone's basic human right.
In 30 seconds: James’s answer opens with one weighted sentence — “Your mindset is extremely common!” The sense of not deserving wealth isn’t your nature; it’s taught by traditional Asian “pickle-jar” (醬缸) culture: from childhood, parents drill in “work hard at labor, don’t get fanciful ideas — gold doesn’t fall from the sky.” The view he wants to correct it with is — “Being rich is a birthright! Happiness is a human right!” We were born deserving to be wealthy; that is the correct, normal view. A lifetime of labor is a mistaken belief and a shackle handed to us by society and family — it enslaved us. Pursuing wealth, happiness, and well-being isn’t asking too much; it is everyone’s basic human right.1
Variants (how people actually ask)
- “I was born with a laborer’s fate — surely I shouldn’t cross into the ‘capitalist’ class this easily? It feels like silently owning a large share of society’s wealth.”
- “I’m afraid heaven will disapprove and send some disruption to break the plan.”
- “I’m afraid that whatever you gain you must lose — that one small thing later (a policy change, a family emergency) will zero the whole plan.”
- “Is this a scarcity mindset or fatalism? Is it common in investor psychology?”
It’s common — not a personal defect
The member laid out his plan clearly: dollar-cost average into the Nasdaq-100 long term, let compounding accumulate, expect a reasonable long-run return. His trouble wasn’t the method — it was that the more reason told him the road worked, the emptier he felt inside. James’s first line of reply is exactly “Your mindset is extremely common!” — removing the self-doubt (“am I unusually weak?”) before answering anything else.1
The cause is “pickle-jar culture,” not your fate
James locates the cause in culture, not in personal character: traditional Asian pickle-jar culture is what produces the sense of not deserving. Parents teach us from childhood — “Work hard at labor, don’t get fanciful ideas; gold doesn’t fall from the sky!”1
This is the flip side of “being rich is a birthright”: the education system’s function is to train competent laborers, and a capitalist doesn’t need to be trained, only to be told. So the sense of unworthiness is really the fact that no one ever told you — not that you fall short. On why the system leaves the road open but unadvertised, see 資本家為何留翻身路會不會崩潰.
The answer: wealth is a birthright, happiness is a human right
James’s own words:1
“Being rich is a birthright! Happiness is a human right!”
We were born deserving to be wealthy — that is the correct, normal view! A lifetime of labor is a mistaken belief and a shackle handed to us by society and family; it enslaved us!
He then lifts the matter to the level of rights rather than of “deserving”: “Teaching people to pursue wealth, happiness, and well-being is as it should be — every one of us is worthy of it! This was always everyone’s basic human right. You have always had the right to a wealthy, happy, fulfilled life.”1
In other words: “do I deserve it” is a misplaced question. In CLEC’s vocabulary, wealth and happiness are human rights, not rewards — and a right doesn’t require you to first prove you’re worthy of it. For the other common form of self-enslavement (a laborer’s body with a capitalist’s head), see 別為錢賣命.
Editor’s note: the “fear of going to zero” half is a risk-control question, not a fate question
This post answers the unworthiness half. The other half of the question — “one small thing will zero the whole plan” — has its own prescriptions elsewhere in CLEC; this page just points the way (this section is editorial, not the post’s wording):
- “Could a policy change or family emergency zero me out?” → a cash-flow and allocation question, not a luck question: cash flow that survives the worst 15 years.
- “Afraid a crash will break the plan” → 崩盤是朋友, 投資的七個層級.
- “Fatalism — feeling the outcome is decided by heaven” → the long run is a falsifiable true proposition; only the short run is random.
- The way that doesn’t run on willpower: make it an identity question — “I am a long-term investor” — so never selling becomes natural instead of a daily tug-of-war with your own unease.
Answer log
- 2026-07-31 (post 0044): A member wrote in saying he was “stuck in a sense of not deserving” and “afraid heaven would disapprove.” James replied: this mindset is extremely common; the cause is Asian pickle-jar culture and what parents instill, which enslaves people; wealth is a birthright, happiness is a human right, and you have always had the right to a wealthy, happy, fulfilled life.1
⚠️ This page summarizes James’s views from a CLEC post (personal outlook and experience sharing), not personalized investment advice. CLEC cares about mental and physical health, but we are not medical or psychological professionals; if the unease persistently affects your life, please consult a qualified professional.
Footnotes
-
CLEC James, post 0044 “You Don’t Not Deserve Wealth — You Were Educated Into Not Daring to Be Wealthy!”, 2026-07-31, X @CLEC168 (member letter 2026-07-26 + James’s reply). Original in
posts/X及YouTube的貼文/0044貼文-你不是不配富有而是被教育成不敢富有-日期2026年7月31日.md; converted source inraw/docs/X及YouTube的貼文/0044…. Source link: https://x.com/CLEC168/status/2082649034653880772 ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6
Sources
-
X及YouTube的貼文/0044貼文【你不是不配富有,而是被教育成不敢富有!】日期:2026年7月31日